Cultural Tourism: From Asset-Driven to Content-Driven

文旅:从资产驱动到内容驱动

2026-09-21 宏观经济 产业分析

文旅赛道的长期基本面依然稳固,成长空间未有动摇。需求侧,国内旅游单季出游人次已突破 17 亿量级,同比保持两位数增长,节假日客流高度集中;政策侧,文旅产业已被定位为国家战略性支柱产业,利好持续释放。方向与确定性,均无需存疑。

但行业总量的扩张,并不必然转化为个体的盈利改善。当前市场最突出的特征,可概括为"旺丁不旺财"——客流规模持续增长,消费转化却明显滞后。这一背离集中体现于人均消费的收缩:出游人次增速(约 16%)显著高于旅游花费增速(约 9.5%),人均单次消费已从约 750 元的高位回落至 570 元附近,并出现同比微降。换言之,人潮涌动的表象之下,是消费意愿与消费能力的同步收敛。其成因具有双重性:宏观层面,居民支出预期趋于谨慎;供给层面,文旅产品创新不足,难以有效激活消费潜能。而后者,恰是行业可以主动作为的部分。

更值得关注的是赛道内部正在发生的结构性分化:重资产模式加速退场,轻资产模式持续破圈。

重资产模式以大额投资、大规模占地为特征,通过仿建古城、人造小镇构建供给。其经营困境已充分显现。河南"只有河南·戏剧幻城"客流量长期高企,省外游客占比逾八成,运营主体仍被母公司以八折价格转让,累计亏损近 1.48 亿元;张家界大庸古城投资超 24 亿元,连年亏损,累计亏损逾 10 亿元。客流不缺而账面惨淡,说明症结不在于引流能力,而在于模式本身的产出效率。

其失效的根源,在于产品的高度标准化与文化的表层化包装。青石板路、仿古建筑、小吃街区这一组合公式沿用近二十年,导致供给严重同质化——造访乌镇,几乎等同于造访周庄、西塘、南浔;业态亦高度趋同,集中于臭豆腐、烤串、银饰、汉服旅拍。当游客的认知水平与审美阈值不断提升,标准化的供给已无法兑现其所需的体验感与新鲜感。消费者真正诉求的体验价值与情绪价值,恰是标准化生产最难供给的部分。

与之相对,一批"小而美"的轻资产项目展现出更强的经营韧性,其共性可归纳为轻投入、重体验、强内容。浙江安吉的瀑布咖啡馆,总投入不足 50 万元,仅于山涧瀑布旁陈设数张桌椅,凭借"瀑布声盖过焦虑"的真实白噪音场景,成为都市人群周末的精神避难所——其消费动机并非饮品本身,而是一段可供放空的时光。北京白塔寺的"再生计划",坚持不拆不建,以社区展览、文创市集与胡同微更新为主要手段,不设门票、不收停车费,依托红墙白塔下的静谧氛围,吸引年轻人跨城前往。曾以民宿见长的德清莫干山,亦已从单一住宿经营转向山野场景运营,围绕水森林、夜游、市集等小尺度场景延伸体验——有创业者租下约 30 亩闲置林地,经溪滩整治后即形成日均接待上百人的清凉空间。

上述项目的共同特质在于:不可复制、不追求规模、不依赖标准。 每个项目都具备独立的审美调性与叙事逻辑,消费者的付费动机正源于这种难以替代的"感觉"。而这,恰恰是重资产模式以规模与标准无法换取的稀缺价值。

由此可得出明确判断:文旅的竞争重心,正在由资产规模转向内容与体验。进入或深耕该行业,应摒弃"重资产、大投入、标准化复制"的传统路径,转向具备真场景、真情感、真体验的轻资产业态,将资源配置集中于内容、设计与体验三个维度。

方向的成立性,可由三组数据佐证:68% 的游客将情感体验列为首要出行目的;45.89% 的年轻群体将"情绪价值"作为出行首要考量;演唱会、音乐节、非遗手作等体验类消费,客单价增速超过 40%。

人仍是那批人,消费能力也依然存在,只是不再为千篇一律的古城与仿古街区买单。

The long-term fundamentals of the cultural tourism sector remain solid, with its growth potential intact. On the demand side, domestic tourist arrivals in a single quarter have exceeded 1.7 billion, maintaining double-digit year-on-year growth, while passenger flows are heavily concentrated during holidays. On the policy side, the cultural tourism industry has been designated a strategic pillar industry of the country, with supportive policies rolling out continuously. Both its trajectory and certainty leave little room for doubt.

Nevertheless, the expansion of the overall industry does not automatically translate into improved profitability for individual operators. The most prominent feature of the current market can be summed up as "high footfall, low revenue". While visitor numbers keep rising, conversion into consumption lags noticeably. This divergence is clearly reflected in shrinking per capita spending: the growth rate of tourist arrivals (around 16%) is markedly higher than that of tourism expenditure (roughly 9.5%). Per capita spending per trip has fallen from a peak of approximately 750 yuan to about 570 yuan, with a slight year-on-year decline. In other words, behind bustling crowds lies a simultaneous weakening of consumers’ willingness and capacity to spend. Two factors contribute to this trend. At the macro level, households hold cautious expectations for spending. On the supply side, cultural tourism products lack sufficient innovation and fail to unlock consumption potential effectively. The latter represents an area where the industry can take proactive action.

Of greater note is the structural segmentation unfolding within the sector: heavy-asset models are phasing out at an accelerated pace, while light-asset models continue to gain traction.

Heavy-asset models are characterized by massive capital investment and large land occupation, creating offerings through reconstructed ancient cities and man-made towns. Their operational difficulties have become fully apparent. Henan’s Only Henan · Drama Fantasy City sustains high visitor volumes, with over 80% of its tourists coming from other provinces. Even so, its operating entity was sold by the parent company at a 20% discount, with accumulated losses of nearly 148 million yuan. The Dayong Ancient City in Zhangjiajie required investment exceeding 2.4 billion yuan and has posted losses year after year, with total losses surpassing 1 billion yuan. Strong visitor numbers paired with poor financial performance indicate that the crux of the problem is not attracting traffic, but the low output efficiency inherent to the business model itself.

The root cause of its decline lies in highly standardized products and superficial cultural packaging. The formula of bluestone pavements, imitation ancient buildings and snack streets has been adopted for nearly two decades, resulting in severe homogenization of supply. A visit to Wuzhen feels almost identical to trips to Zhouzhuang, Xitang and Nanxun. Business formats are also highly similar, dominated by stinky tofu, grilled skewers, silver ornaments and Hanfu portrait photography. As tourists’ cognitive level and aesthetic thresholds keep rising, standardized offerings can no longer deliver the sense of experience and freshness they seek. The experiential and emotional value that consumers truly desire is precisely what standardized production struggles to provide.

By contrast, a number of small-scale, refined light-asset projects have demonstrated stronger operational resilience. Their shared traits can be summarized as low investment, experience orientation and compelling content. The Waterfall Café in Anji, Zhejiang required total investment of less than 500,000 yuan. It merely places several tables and chairs beside a mountain stream waterfall. Leveraging the natural white noise of cascading water that "drowns out anxiety", it has become a weekend mental retreat for urban dwellers. Visitors pay not so much for the drinks, as for a period of undistracted downtime. The White Pagoda Temple Regeneration Project in Beijing adheres to a no-demolition, no-new-construction principle. It mainly relies on community exhibitions, cultural and creative markets and minor hutong renovations. With no admission fees or parking charges, it draws young cross-city visitors with the tranquil atmosphere beneath red walls and the white pagoda. Moganshan in Deqing, once famous for homestays, has shifted from pure accommodation operation to mountain scene management, extending experiences around forest water features, night tours and small-scale markets. One entrepreneur rented roughly 30 mu of idle woodland. After stream renovation, the site became a cool space receiving hundreds of visitors daily.

These projects share one core attribute: they are hard to replicate, do not pursue scale, and reject standardization. Each boasts an independent aesthetic tone and narrative logic. Consumers pay for this irreplaceable "vibe", a scarce value that heavy-asset models built on scale and standardization cannot obtain.

A clear conclusion can thus be drawn: competition in cultural tourism is shifting from asset scale toward content and experience. Enterprises entering or deepening engagement in this sector should abandon the traditional path of heavy assets, large investment and standardized replication. Instead, they need to embrace light-asset formats featuring authentic scenes, genuine sentiment and immersive experiences, concentrating resources on three dimensions: content, design and experience.

Three sets of data back up the validity of this direction: 68% of tourists rank emotional experience as their primary travel purpose; 45.89% of young people regard "emotional value" as the top consideration for trips; experiential consumption such as concerts, music festivals and intangible cultural heritage handicraft workshops sees average order value growth exceeding 40%.

The same groups of tourists remain, and spending power still exists. They simply no longer pay for cookie-cutter ancient towns and imitation antique blocks.